/explore

Click through on any links that interest you or select the planets on the right to continue exploring the Outer Web.
You are here

 ukconstitutionallaw.org
Mark Elliott: A "Permanent" Scottish Parliament and the Sovereignty of the UK Parliament: Four Perspectives - UK Constitution...
| | publiclawforeveryone.com
Devolution in the Supreme Court: Legislative supremacy, Parliament's 'unqualified' power, and 'modifying' the Scotland Act - Public Law for Everyone
1.6 parsecs away

Travel
| | By Mark Elliott and Nicholas Kilford In the Continuity Bill Reference, the Supreme Court advanced a striking analysis of the implications for devolution of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty - or, more specifically, of the provision in the Scotland Act 1998 that had hitherto been understood merely to affirm that doctrine. The provision in question...
| | iamsteve.in
No, the Scottish Parliament isn't Sovereign - Stephen McLeod Blythe - Clicky Steve
0.8 parsecs away

Travel
| | Today I came across an article published on CommonSpace.scot by a guy called Anthony Barrnett, founder ofopendemocracy.net.Entitled 'Why the EU vote is an English, not British, reckoning', it discusses the upcoming EU referendum, and the potential implications, with a particular look at the Scottish element. It seemed like a good read, but before I got...
| | lawandreligionuk.com
The Smith Commission, further Scottish devolution - and religion? | Law & Religion UK
1.1 parsecs away

Travel
| | [AI summary] The article analyzes the Smith Commission's recommendations on Scottish devolution, specifically examining which religious and legal issues regarding equality, healthcare (abortion), and charity tax remain reserved or are proposed for transfer to the Scottish Parliament.
| | ukconstitutionallaw.org
Michael Detmold: The Supreme Court and the Executive Power of History - UK Constitutional Law Association
29.6 parsecs away

Travel
| Introduction The best Constitution in the world has, through its highest court, over-reached in two fundamental ways: it has founded its constitutional thought on a slipping meaning of 'Parliament' - its most important constitutional word. And it has failed to understand history. By this second claim, I do not mean that the history it has...