/explore
|
You are here 
|
thetexasorator.com | ||
| | | | |
www.scientificamerican.com
|
|
| | | | | Quantum computers would be exceptionally fast at a few specific tasks, but it appears that for most problems they would outclass today's computers only modestly. This realization may lead to a new fundamental physical principle | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | | | I've had a miserable week (only partly because of the headaches and coughing fits that have been keeping me up all night), and feel a need to be of use to some other human being without leaving my apartment. So this thread is for you to ask about whatever's on your mind -- complexity classes,... | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | | | The big news of the week is OpenAI introducing the Superalignment Taskforce. OpenAI is pledging 20% of compute secured to date towards a four year ef... | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | (Note: I wrote this with editing help from Rob and Eliezer. Eliezer's responsible for a few of the paragraphs.) A common confusion I see in the tiny fragment of the world that knows about logical decision theory (FDT/UDT/etc.), is that people think LDT agents are genial and friendly for each other.[1] One recent example is Will Eden's tweet about how maybe a molecular paperclip/squiggle maximizer would leave humanity a few stars/galaxies/whatever on game-theoretic grounds. (And that's just one example; I hear this suggestion bandied around pretty often.) | ||
