Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
historyforatheists.com | ||
| | | | |
vridar.org
|
|
| | | | | The reason my posts relating to Biblical questions so often express a view that is inconsistent with mainstream narratives has nothing to do with wanting to be different (as the moderator on the earlywritings forum has patronizingly insisted) but everything to do with examining the evidence accordin | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.blogspot.co.za
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The author critiques New Atheist pseudo-historical claims and defends their own atheism while advocating for accurate historical analysis and debunking of biased narratives. | |
| | | | |
jwwartick.com
|
|
| | | | | "[I]n the case of Jesus Christ, where virtually every detail of the story fits the mythic hero archetype, with nothing left over, no 'secular,' biographical data, so to speak, it becomes arbitrary to assert that there must have been a historical figure lying back of the myth."[1] One needs only to ask the question, "Did... | |
| | | | |
mathscholar.org
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The article discusses the intersection of science and philosophy, highlighting the importance of empirical evidence and the scientific method in advancing knowledge. It critiques postmodern science studies for lacking scientific rigor and credibility, referencing the Sokal hoax as a key example. The piece also touches on the contributions of non-Western societies to science and the need for diversity in the scientific community. Ultimately, it concludes that while philosophical reflection has value, it should not replace the empirical foundation of scientific research. | ||
