/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.apmreports.org | ||
| | | | |
righttoreadproject.com
I understand why advocates, researchers, and policymakers who feel the urgency of our literacy crisis are frustrated when teachers don't embrace reading science. But my entry into the world of read... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
dianeravitch.net
Rebecca Redelmeier writes in Chalkbeat about passage of a new law in Pennsylvania mandating the use of "evidence-based" reading instruction. By that, they mean that teachers should teach reading by relying on what is called "the science of reading." This terminology is based on a federal report that was released to the public in 2000,... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
nepc.colorado.edu
Suppose one tries to debate the Science of Reading (SoR) and what it is precisely. They will likely be met by cognitive psychologists, parents, and educators who are insistent about the importance of neuroscience. Trying to understand how the brain works and why some children have learning disabilities has existed for decades. I'm staring at an old textbook special education teachers used: Alexander Bannatyne's 1971Language, Reading, and Learning Disabilities: Psychology, Neuropsychology, Diagnosis, and Remediation. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
chava61photography.photo.blog
Visit the post for more. |
|
| | | |||
