Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.computationalcomplexity.org | ||
| | | | |
blog.geomblog.org
|
|
| | | | | +Rasmus Pagh and I chaired ALENEX 2018 , and we decided to experiment with double blind review for the conference. What follows is a repor... | |
| | | | |
thmatters.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The Computational Complexity Blog - complexity theory, Lance Fortnow Ernie's 3D Pancakes - algorithms, geometry, Jeff Erikson Vanity of Vanities, all is Vanity - algorithms,... | |
| | | | |
windowsontheory.org
|
|
| | | | | Michael Mitzenmacher pointsto two posts ofSuresh Venkatasubramanian on the issue of so called "double blind reviews" (i.e., anonymous submissions) in theory conferences. In short, both Michael and Suresh think they are a good idea. I agree with much of their motivations, but, based on my experience in both non-blinded (e.g., STOC/FOCS) and blinded (e.g., CRYPTO) | |
| | | | |
www.nber.org
|
|
| | | |||
