Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
thatsmaths.com | ||
| | | | |
andrea.corbellini.name
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The text provides an in-depth explanation of elliptic curve cryptography (ECC), covering fundamental concepts such as elliptic curves over finite fields, point addition, cyclic subgroups, subgroup orders, and the discrete logarithm problem. It also discusses practical aspects like finding base points, cofactors, and the importance of choosing subgroups with high order for cryptographic security. The text emphasizes that ECC relies on the difficulty of solving the discrete logarithm problem on elliptic curves, which is considered computationally hard and forms the basis for secure cryptographic protocols like ECDH and ECDSA. | |
| | | | |
matheuscmss.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Last November, I attended the beautiful conferencePrime Numbers, Determinism and PseudorandomnessatCIRM. This conference was originally prepared to celebrate the 60th birthday ofChristian Mauduit, but unfortunately a tragic event during the summer of 2019 made that this conference ended up becoming a celebration of the memory of Christian. The links to the titles, abstracts, slides and... | |
| | | | |
mattbaker.blog
|
|
| | | | | In honor of Pi Day 2023, I'd like to discuss Hilbert's 7th Problem, which in an oversimplified (and rather vague) form asks: under what circumstances can a transcendental function take algebraic values at algebraic points? The connection with $latex \pi$ is that Lindemann proved in 1882 that the transcendental function $latex f(z) = e^z$ takes... | |
| | | | |
math.andrej.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the philosophical and methodological pluralism in mathematics, emphasizing that mathematics is a human-made construct with historical developments rather than an absolute, universal truth. Key points include the idea that different mathematical frameworks (e.g., classical vs. intuitionistic logic, paraconsistent logic) represent distinct 'worlds' of mathematics, each with its own standards and validity. The conversation highlights the importance of acknowledging these pluralistic perspectives without assuming a single, unifying foundation. It also touches on the role of context, the evolution of mathematical concepts, and the implications of relativism for the future of mathematics. The discussion underscores that ... | ||
