Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
janik6n.net | ||
| | | | |
blog.oddbit.com
|
|
| | | | | At work we have a cluster of IBM Power 9 systems running OpenShift. The problem with this environment is that nobody runs Power 9 on their desktop, and Docker Hub only offers automatic build support for the x86 architecture. This means there's no convenient options for building Power 9 Docker images...or so I thought. It turns out that Docker provides GitHub actions that make the process of producing multi-architecture images quite simple. | |
| | | | |
blog.martincostello.com
|
|
| | | | | Publishing a .NET application as a container image using the .NET SDK without needing a Dockerfile and attesting the provenance of the image with GitHub Actions. | |
| | | | |
brunoscheufler.com
|
|
| | | | | Last week I published a piece on how running a CI-driven commit-based release infrastructure can improve your time-to-release drastically. I noticed that it wasn't super clear on how to get services running that aren't typically bundled or packaged up like container images, for example, frontend deployments. The issue here was that running all workflow steps in one routine every time something changed would take a long time, so usually, people put them into asynchronous flows, to run deployments to compl... | |
| | | | |
blog.fredrb.com
|
|
| | | Tiny Python Docker Images I was looking for a way to create a very small docker image for a Python project. The python project I created is a Telegram bot quizzes me in German. The python-telegram-bot pip package requires gcc to fully build- so using alpine image did not do the trick for me. I searched online, found a few example bot none that would actually do what I needed with a reasonable image size. | ||
