/explore
|
You are here 
|
enthusiasmscepticismscience.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
www.climate-skeptic.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This article by Michael Crichton critiques the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) consensus, arguing that the science is not settled, the debate is now unethical, and the movement has become a political vehicle for socialists and anti-corporate groups driven by fear rather than objective inquiry. | |
| | | | |
fabiusmaximus.com
|
|
| | | | | Summary: Today we have an excerpt from a longer work describing one of the key global diplomatic meetings shaping the early 21st century world, our equivalent of the Congress of Vienna in 1815. In the era of 4GW State-to-State wars are replaced by global conferences setting policy about currencies, trade - and climate change. Excerpt [...] | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry The limits of judicial competence and the risk of taking sides Several recent posts have discussed the involvement of courts in climate science disputes: The Urgenda ruling in the Netherlands Minnesota Trial: Social Cost of Carbon RICO ... Continue reading | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | by Judith Curry Climate science is sometimes characterized by skeptics as pseudoscience. Here are the arguments for why climate science is not pseudoscience. From the Wikipedia: Pseudoscienceis a claim, belief, or practice which is presented asscientific, but does not ... Continue reading | ||
