/explore
|
You are here 
|
forbetterscience.com | ||
| | | | |
svpow.com
|
|
| | | | | This Monday and Tuesday, I was at the R2R (Researcher to Reader) conference at BMA House in London. It's the first time I've been to this, and I was there at the invitation of my old sparring partner Rick Anderson, who was organizing this year's debate, on the proposition "The venue of its publication tells... | |
| | | | |
drmalcolmkendrick.org
|
|
| | | | | 17th March 2023 Recently, I was in Phoenix Arizona for a few days to attend the Broken Science Initiative Conference. This organisation was set up by Greg Glassman, who founded CrossFit, and Emily Kaplan, a media expert. The title of the organisation may give you a clue as to its purpose. For my part I... | |
| | | | |
vaxopedia.org
|
|
| | | | | Andy Wakefield's new movie 1986 The Act is exactly what you would expect - misinformation and propaganda against vaccines - don't be fooled again. | |
| | | | |
www.quackometer.net
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The text presents a debate over the historical use of homeopathy by notable figures like Charles Darwin, with Dana Ullman asserting that Darwin's physician, Dr. James Manby Gully, was a homeopath and that Darwin benefited from his treatments. Ullman provides references from Gully's book, claiming that Gully endorsed homeopathy and that Darwin's health improved significantly under his care. However, HCN and Mojo challenge these claims, questioning the evidence and pointing out that Gully's practice was primarily hydropathy, not homeopathy. The discussion also touches on the current use of homeopathy, with concerns about its efficacy and potential risks to patients. The overall tone is contentious, with both sides presenting arguments and countera... | ||
