Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
vadimkravcenko.com | ||
| | | | |
strangercodingtings.home.blog
|
|
| | | | | A few years ago, I was talking to my manager about how we have a lack of people that like to perform Code Reviews, and it needed to change. He said since I had gained a reputation of being a good code reviewer, maybe I should do a presentation. I said it probably wasn't that... | |
| | | | |
blog.pragmaticengineer.com
|
|
| | | | | Good code needs to meets two key requirements. First, it should be correct: when executing, it should produce the result that is expected. Second, it should be easy to read for other developers. Coding is a social activity. Your code does not exist in a vacuum, just implementing a lone | |
| | | | |
flameeyes.blog
|
|
| | | | | I've been meaning to write my commentary on code reviews for a while. This is particularly a view of how code reviews are done in the workplace, rather than in Free Software projects. | |
| | | | |
rachelcarmena.github.io
|
|
| | | Trying to answer to What methodology? | ||
