Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.johndcook.com | ||
| | | | |
www.hillelwayne.com
|
|
| | | | | Have a tweet: img {border-style: groove;} I have no idea if Pony is making the right choice here, I don't know Pony, and I don't have any interest in learning Pony.1 But this tweet raised my hackles for two reasons: It's pretty smug. I have very strong opinions about programming, but one rule I try to follow is do not mock other programmers.2 Programming is too big and I'm too small to understand everything. | |
| | | | |
paperman.name
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
justinhj.github.io
|
|
| | | | | What's in this post? | |
| | | | |
dominiczypen.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The starting point of this blog post is a slight reformulation of the $latex T_0$ separation axiom: A topological space $latex (X,\tau)$ is $latex T_0$ if for all $latex x\neq y\in X$ there is a set $latex U\in \tau$ such that $latex \{x,y\}\cap U \neq \emptyset \text{ and } \{x,y\}\not\subseteq U.$ Given a cardinal $latex... | ||
