Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
dianaverse.com | ||
| | | | |
eukaryotewritesblog.com
|
|
| | | | | This is a rather utilitarian list of approaches to improving the lives of animals even if you still eat meat. Among other things, donating $100 to the right charity has the same impact as going vegetarian for thirteen years. | |
| | | | |
www.thenakedscientists.com
|
|
| | | | | Marine biologist Helen Scales took this on... Helen - It's a great question and something that stirs up seafood lovers a lot. You've got your oyster there; you're shucking it away, adding a squeeze of lemon juice, and they say you should see the oyster twitching if you put lemon juice on it; this shows they can sense chemicals and they can sense things going on. Do they feel | |
| | | | |
magnusvinding.com
|
|
| | | | | While there may be strong deontological or virtue-ethical reasons to avoid consuming animal products ("as far as is possible and practicable"), the consequentialist case for such avoidance is quite weak. Or at least this appears to be a common view in some consequentialist-leaning circles. My aim in this post is to argue against this view.... | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | ||
