|
You are here |
www.paritybit.ca | ||
| | | | |
subfictional.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article critiques the push for new open source licenses like the Hippocratic License, arguing that they are not necessary for building communities around shared values. It highlights the importance of understanding the foundations of FOSS, engaging in practical community-building, and collaborating rather than imposing singular visions. The author emphasizes that existing licenses and the global commons already provide a framework for contributing to shared values, and that focusing on legal and community efforts outside of licensing is more effective. The piece also stresses the need for collective, evidence-based approaches over individual heroism in driving change. | |
| | | | |
trendless.tech
|
|
| | | | | While intellectual property generally sits on a spectrum of usage (e.g., free to consume but not distribute, free to distribute if it's also free), software also has its own complexities regarding free use of its code. The broad term for the entire domain was FOSS (Free and Open Source Software), but has more particularly used [...]Read More... from FLOSS Software: How Do You Give Away Software? | |
| | | | |
unixsheikh.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.adamsdesk.com
|
|
| | | A reminder on the importance of emotional support and how this can be achieved in our community of free and open source software projects. | ||