/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.tbray.org | ||
| | | | |
existentialtype.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | While reviewing some of the comments on my post about parallelism and concurrency, I noticed that the great fallacy about dynamic and static languages continues to hold people in its thrall. So, in the same "everything you know is wrong" spirit, let me try to set this straight: a dynamic language is a straightjacketed static | |
| | | | |
jao.io
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
chadaustin.me
|
|
| | | | | This may be the only time I weigh in on the static vs. dynamic typing discussion. Each side has its extreme proponents, and people differ in their ability and desire to work in systems with implicit invariants. Many years ago, back when Java and C++ were the Mainstream Languages and Python was the shiny new up-and-comer, I read Bruce Eckel's arguments in support of dynamically typed languages, and some of the nonobvious (at the time) ways you can get more done at higher quality in a more flexible languag... | |
| | | | |
faultlore.com
|
|
| | | |||
