Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
battellemedia.com | ||
| | | | |
bogost.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] A federal judge has ruled Google a monopolist, potentially leading to changes in its business practices, but the outcome may not significantly impact consumers or Google's dominance. | |
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] A federal judge ruled that Google violated US antitrust law by maintaining a monopoly in the search and advertising markets through practices like paying companies to be the default search engine. The ruling, led by Judge Amit Mehta, highlights how these payments incentivize companies like Apple to avoid competing with Google, thus preserving Google's dominance. The case now moves to determining remedies, with potential changes to the search market and antitrust enforcement. | |
| | | | |
blog.kagi.com
|
|
| | | | | Google search is in the news. | |
| | | | |
rooney.law
|
|
| | | The first antitrust decision of the modern-day internet era against a technology giant. In a landmark ruling, US District Judge Amit Mehta (an apt surname for this case) decided that Google illegally exploited its search engine market dominance to stifle competition. Judge Mehta said Google was a "monopolist" who "acted as one to maintain its | ||
