/explore
|
You are here 
|
clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu | ||
| | | | |
www.moneyandbanking.com
On December 20, one of us (Steve) engaged in a debate with Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School on whether crypto should face federal financial regulation. Hosted by the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings, and moderated by Kelly Evans of CNBC, you can watch the one-hour debate here. We found both the questions and the discussion very enlightening. In this post, we will summarize our views, as well as those of Professor Conti-Brown. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
nymag.com
A core group of Wall Street heavy hitters remain think the cryptocurrency is bound for zero. Are they onto something big - or just fighting the last war? |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.moneyness.ca
I sympathize with parts of the let it burn thesis. The thesis goes a bit like this: Crypto is mostly gambling. It provides very little of s... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
dissidentvoice.org
Faramarz Farbod: You have taught at Princeton University for four decades; you were the UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories in Israel (2008-2014); and you are the author of numerous books about global issues and international law. In preparation for this conversation, I have been reading your autobiography, Public Intellectual: |
|
| | | |||
