/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.lesswrong.com | ||
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
From a talk at UT Austin in September 2025. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
joecarlsmith.com
From a talk at UT Austin in September 2025. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
(Update Dec 2025: This series has been almost entirely superseded by a newer and more polished series, available here. This is the second in a series of four posts about how we might solve the alignment problem. See the first post for an introduction to this project and a summary of the posts that have been released thus far.) In my last post, I laid out the ontology I'm going to use for thinking about approaches to solving the alignment problem (that is, the problem of building superintelligent AI agents, and becoming able to elicit their beneficial capabilities, with succumbing to the bad kind of AI takeover[1]). In particular: |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.lrb.co.uk
Deepseek was set up as a research initiative unconstrained by commercial imperatives, with the aim of achieving... |
|
| | | |||
