Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.cs.umd.edu | ||
| | | | |
countingfromzero.blog
|
|
| | | | | This was a big week for Computer Science at Whitman: On Saturday, I learned that Personnel Committee is recommending me for tenure. Yesterday, the faculty voted to approve the creation of a new Computer Science major. Getting tenure the second time is not as exciting as the first time,but it's still a relief. Giving up... | |
| | | | |
blog.sigplan.org
|
|
| | | | | The open-source development of the JavaScript programming language is now automatically checked. The language specification written in English is type checked, and the tests are checked for conform... | |
| | | | |
www.morling.dev
|
|
| | | | | 27 years of age, and alive and kicking?-?The Java platform regularly comes out amongst the top contenders in rankings like the TIOBE index. In my opinion, rightly so. The language is very actively maintained and constantly improved; its underlying runtime, the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), is one of, if not the most, advanced runtime environments for managed programming languages. There is a massive eco-system of Java libraries which make it a great tool for a large number of use cases, ranging from comman... | |
| | | | |
nurkiewicz.com
|
|
| | | When choosing or learning a new programming language, type system should be your first question. How strict is that language when types don't really match? Will there be a conservative, slow and annoying compiler? Or maybe a fast feedback loop, often resulting in crashes at runtime? And also, is the language runtime trusting you know what you are doing, even if you don't? Or maybe it's babysitting you, making it hard to write fast, low-level code? Believe it or not, I just described static, dynamic, weak and strong typing. | ||
