Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
vincent.bernat.ch | ||
| | | | |
serverascode.com
|
|
| | | | | A techno-blog for our techno-times | |
| | | | |
blog.oddbit.com
|
|
| | | | | Last week, Oskar Stenberg asked on Unix & Linux if it were possible to configure connectivity between two networks, both using the same address range, without involving network namespaces. That is, given this high level view of the network... ...can we set things up so that hosts on the "inner" network can communicate with hosts on the "outer" network using the range 192.168.3.0/24, and similarly for communication in the other direction? | |
| | | | |
ops.tips
|
|
| | | | | Yet another blog post on how to create a virtual network that connects network namespaces using a brdige, veth pairs and iptables. | |
| | | | |
blues.win
|
|
| | | I am fascinated by discussions around so-called immutable Linux distributions, especially how the community debates whether operating systems like Bazzite are suitable for different kinds of users. Bazzite has become the most popular member of the Fedora Atomic family, even outpacing Fedora's own offerings of Silverblue and Kinoite (see: countme stats). As it grows in visibility, people are starting to question what exactly sets it apart. Consider a recent post in /r/linux_gaming that asks: | ||
