Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
www.drroyspencer.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around climate change, with participants debating the causes and implications of recent warming trends. Key points include: 1) The role of natural variability, such as ocean oscillations (AMO, PDO, ENSO), in climate patterns, with some suggesting these could explain warming without anthropogenic factors. 2) Disputes over the significance of short-term trends versus long-term climate data, with critics arguing that trends over decades provide more reliable insights. 3) Skepticism about the consensus on human-induced climate change, with some advocating for further research and caution against alarmism. 4) References to historical periods like the Little Ice Age (LIA) and the 1930s warming, highlighting the complexity of in... | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | | | The Sceptical Science kidz and Trenberth think that the deep ocean has absorbed all the heat that isn't showing up in the atmosphere, and that's [why] we have "the pause". Well, that's busted now according to ARGO data and JPL and it has NOT gone into the deep ocean. NOTE: Graph by Bob Tisdale -... | |
| | | | |
blog.hotwhopper.com
|
|
| | | | | Global warming & climate change. Eavesdropping on climate science deniers, their weird pseudo-science and crazy conspiracy theories. | |
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The provided text is a discussion thread on climate change and the greenhouse effect, featuring various perspectives and arguments. The key points include debates over the role of CO2 in global warming, the mechanisms of the greenhouse effect, and the validity of climate models. Some contributors argue that CO2 does not significantly contribute to warming, while others support the mainstream scientific consensus. The discussion includes references to empirical data, such as temperature records from specific locations, and critiques of climate policy and scientific institutions. The tone varies between scientific analysis and skepticism, with some participants challenging the IPCC's conclusions and others defending the greenhouse effect as a fund... | ||
