Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.acamedia.info | ||
| | | | |
australianclimatesceptics.com
|
|
| | | | | (HINT: NO!) by Astrophysicist Dr Gordon Fulks From our old blog - Saturday, 27 October 2018 (LINK) hidden from the public by the Goons at Google who can't handle the truth! Reconstructed Total Solar Irradiance (after Wang 2005) withAbdussamatov's prediction out to the mid 21st century. The short answer is "NO!" But the longer answer is | |
| | | | |
www.davidappell.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The history of climate change research shows that scientists have long recognized the potential impact of human activities on the climate. From the early 20th century, there were discussions about the greenhouse effect and its influence on global temperatures. Over time, as more data became available, the consensus among scientists grew that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, are a significant factor in global warming. Key milestones include the 1958 discovery of the Keeling Curve, which demonstrated the steady rise in atmospheric CO2 levels, and the 1970s and 1980s when the scientific community began to more clearly understand the implications of these changes. By the late 20th century, the evidence supp... | |
| | | | |
www.theguardian.com
|
|
| | | | | A healthy ocean is vital for a healthy planet, and healthy coral reefs lie at the heart of ocean biodiversity | |
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The provided text is a discussion thread on climate change and the greenhouse effect, featuring various perspectives and arguments. The key points include debates over the role of CO2 in global warming, the mechanisms of the greenhouse effect, and the validity of climate models. Some contributors argue that CO2 does not significantly contribute to warming, while others support the mainstream scientific consensus. The discussion includes references to empirical data, such as temperature records from specific locations, and critiques of climate policy and scientific institutions. The tone varies between scientific analysis and skepticism, with some participants challenging the IPCC's conclusions and others defending the greenhouse effect as a fund... | ||
