/explore
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
In this post, we'll discuss a recent article and blog post about the recently published England et al. (2014). This post includes portions of past posts and a number of new discussions and illustrations. We've already discussed (post here) the paper England et al. (2014) Recent intensification of wind-driven circulation in the Pacific and the... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.climate-resistance.org
[AI summary] The discussion revolves around the concept of scientific consensus on climate change and the role of the Cook et al. paper in addressing perceived disagreements. Key points include: 1. **Consensus Clarification**: The Cook et al. paper aims to demonstrate strong agreement within the scientific community, countering claims of a lack of consensus. However, some argue that the paper oversimplifies the consensus by focusing on specific aspects (e.g., IPCC reports) and may not capture the full range of scientific opinions. 2. **Polarization and Misrepresentation**: The debate is seen as polarized, with scientists often viewed as part of a political stance rather than as neutral experts. This polarization is attributed to political influence on cli... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
cliscep.com
Do my hard-pressed editor a favor and click the link to the original here 14th November 2019 Tony Thomas It's the tenth anniversary next week of the 2009 Climategate email dump that exposed top climate scientists' chicanery and subversion of science - and did so in their own words and out of their own mouths,... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.climatecodered.org
The climate emergency requires actions at emergency speed for a rapid transition to a post-carbon, safe-climate future. |
|
| | | |||
