Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
talyarkoni.org | ||
| | | | |
pedermisager.org
|
|
| | | | | Personal website of Dr. Peder M. Isager | |
| | | | |
jaydaigle.net
|
|
| | | | | This is the second-part of a three-part series on hypothesis testing. Today we'll look at the way we do hypothesis testing in practice, and how it tends to fail. Modern researchers use hypothesis testing as a tool to develop knowledge, but it's really a tool for making decisions, and so it encourages us to draw strong conclusions from weak evidence. It also encourages us to view studies that don't reject the null hypothesis as failures, which leads even honest and dedicated researchers to do shoddy resea... | |
| | | | |
jessegalef.com
|
|
| | | | | In Episode 53 of the Rationally Speaking Podcast, Massimo and I take on parapsychology, the study of phenomena such as extrasensory perception, precognition, and remote viewing. We discuss the type of studies parapsychologists conduct, what evidence they've found, and how we should interpret that evidence. The field is mostly not taken seriously by other scientists,... | |
| | | | |
errorstatistics.com
|
|
| | | David Cox's famous "weighing machine" example" from my last post is thought to have caused "a subtle earthquake" in foundations of statistics. It's been 11 years since I published my Statistical Science article on this, Mayo (2014), which includes several commentators, but the issue is still mired in controversy. It's generally dismissed as an annoying,... | ||
