Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.thedigitalcatonline.com | ||
| | | | |
anthonysciamanna.com
|
|
| | | | | I've often heard developers declare that unit testing doesn't work only to discover a test suite full of complex, brittle, and unmaintainable tests. Fortu... | |
| | | | |
blog.jakubholy.net
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.codesimplicity.com
|
|
| | | | | Much like we gain knowledge about the behavior of the physical universe via the scientific method, we gain knowledge about the behavior of our software via a system of assertion, observation, and experimentation called "testing." There are many things one could desire to know about a software system. It seems that most often we want to know if it actually behaves like we intended it to behave. That is, we wrote some code with a particular intention in mind, does it actually do that when we run it? In a sense, testing software is the reverse of the traditional scientific | |
| | | | |
everythingfunctional.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | The answer to the question of whether we should write automated test suites has largely been settled. We absolutely should write unit tests, and possibly even integration and end-to-end tests. But as acceptance of this practice grew, and adoption became more widespread, a follow-up question arose; How many tests should we write? How do we... | ||
