/explore
|
You are here 
|
gizmodo.com | ||
| | | | |
www.fosspatents.com
Long after office hours on Wednesday, Germany's Bundespatentgericht (Federal Patent Court) ruled in Apple's favor and invalidated in its ent... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.macrumors.com
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) today formally opposed Apple's motion for the Apple Watch sales ban to remain paused for the... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.fosspatents.com
In a filing made late on Friday by local time, Apple points to a California jury's finding of willful patent infringement by Samsung and "r... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
mjtsai.com
[AI summary] The text discusses Apple's response to the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), focusing on the Core Technology Fee (CTF) and its implications. Key points include: 1. Apple's compliance with the DMA involves introducing the CTF, a fee based on app downloads, which critics argue is a disguised tax on developers. 2. The CTF is seen as a way for Apple to maintain revenue while appearing to comply with regulations. 3. Developers, especially indie creators, are critical of the fee, arguing it disproportionately affects smaller developers and stifles innovation. 4. The text highlights the broader debate over tech monopolies and regulatory responses, with some suggesting the EU could impose stricter penalties on Apple. 5. There is also mention of alternativ... |
|
| | | |||
