/explore
|
You are here 
|
rjosephhoffmann.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
vridar.org
|
|
| | | | | Well this is bizarre. I find myself in agreement with a very substantial bulk of a recent article by Jim West at The Bible and Interpretation, "A (Very, Very) Short History of Minimalism: From The Chronicler to the Present." Jim West argues that biblical studies of the history of early Christianity | |
| | | | |
bibleinterp.arizona.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion centers around the historicity of Jesus and mythicist interpretations. Key points include the use of the Gospels as historical evidence, the debate over the crucifixion's location (earthly vs. heavenly), the role of Pauline traditions in early Christianity, and the evolution of Jesus' portrayal from celestial to historical figures. Participants engage with Rudolf Bultmann's challenge of reconciling Jesus as both a divine being and a historical person, and explore mythicist views like euhemerism and historicizing. The conversation also touches on the apostolic traditions, the resurrection appearances, and the potential motivations behind Paul's silence on Jesus' teachings. | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.com
|
|
| | | | | The consensus of scholars, including non-Christian scholars, is that a historical Jesus most likely existed and the later stories about "Jesus Christ" were told about him. The idea that there was no such historical person at all and that "Jesus Christ" was a purely mythical figure has been posited in one form or another since the eighteenth century, but is not taken seriously by anyone but a tiny handful of fringe scholars and amateurs. Despite this, the Jesus Myth thesis... Read More Read More | |
| | | | |
www.biointelligence-explosion.com
|
|
| | | Do biological minds have a future? | ||
