Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
osc.universityofcalifornia.edu | ||
| | | | |
www.timeshighereducation.com
|
|
| | | | | Academics remain wedded to prestige indicators, but peer reviewers mayconclude that the journal is profiteering, says Dorothy Bishop | |
| | | | |
svpow.com
|
|
| | | | | In opposition to my speech supporting the motion "the open access movement has failed", here's what Jessica Polka said in opposition to the motion. The open access movement has not failed. It is in the process of succeeding. Indeed, over 50% of papers are now open access. And this proportion is set to increase,... | |
| | | | |
www.samuelmoore.org
|
|
| | | | | This post makes a case for universities investing in people and processes for reviewing research in house before publication. This idea has no doubt been proposed before and is probably already a feature of some academic institutions, but I wanted to clarify here why I think it would benefit academic research. High-energy physics research is ... Continue reading "How to shed light on in-house publication review processes?" | |
| | | | |
hub.jhu.edu
|
|
| | | The university's 10th academic division, based in Washington, D.C., will build on JHU's longstanding leadership in research and discovery to develop solutions to contemporary policy challenges | ||
