|
You are here |
blog.anew.social | ||
| | | | |
john.onolan.org
|
|
| | | | | Thoughts on open source governance, non-profit organisations, and how to create trust within technology and media. | |
| | | | |
ericholscher.com
|
|
| | | | | The open source ecosystem is the most valuable part of the software industry today. From the programming languages to the web frameworks, the operating system to the cryptography, all software comp... | |
| | | | |
blog.opencollective.com
|
|
| | | | | Helping companies invest in open source projects because we want open source creators to have a good livelihood and work sustainably, which is critical to the health of the whole ecosystem. | |
| | | | |
yasoob.me
|
|
| | | Hi people! Recently, I was super confused when I found out that: >>> pow(3,89) runs slower than: >>> 3**89 I tried to think of a suitable answer but couldn't find any. I timed the execution of both of these statements using the timeit module in Python3: $ python3 -m timeit 'pow(3,89)' 500000 loops, best of 5: 688 nsec per loop $ python3 -m timeit '3**89' 500000 loops, best of 5: 519 nsec per loop The difference is not big. | ||