Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
tink.uk | ||
| | | | |
dht.is
|
|
| | | | | WebAIM has been conducting surveys on web accessibility for years (see WebAIM projects), including a survey of Screen Reader users since 2009. The latest survey was published in September 2019. I encourage everyone to read through their results and analysis as it won't take long, but here are the four key insights I found. Note: Numbers rounded to the nearest full number. #1 - The technology landscape for screen readers is fragmented, but usage is not. A predominant number of users rely only on a handful of platforms and technologies. More is always better when it comes to testing, but given the scarcity of time, talent, and treasure, I would expect the best ROI by prioritizing the following list: | |
| | | | |
archive.nytimes.com
|
|
| | | | | We incorporated feedback from an accessibility testing audit (the first of many we plan to have) and introduced a number of improvements to NYTimes.com for screen reader users. | |
| | | | |
bluemodus.com
|
|
| | | | | WebAIM has been conducting surveys on web accessibility for years, including a survey of Screen Reader users since 2009. The latest survey performed was published in September 2019. | |
| | | | |
georgemauer.net
|
|
| | | |||
