Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
arne-mertz.de | ||
| | | | |
akrzemi1.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | The language feature in C++17 known as class template argument deduction was intended to supersede factory functions like make_pair, make_tuple, make_optional, as described in p0091r2. This goal has not been fully achieved and we may still need to stick to make_ functions. In this post we will briefly describe what class template argument deduction is,... | |
| | | | |
www.foonathan.net
|
|
| | | | | Just like regular function parameters, template parameters can also have default parameters. For class templates, this behaves mostly just like default function arguments: if you pass fewer template arguments than required, default template arguments are used to fill the remaining places. However, for function templates, it gets more complicated as template parameters for functions can be deduced by the normal function arguments. This leads to some interesting side-effects. In particular, default argumen... | |
| | | | |
artificial-mind.net
|
|
| | | | | Articles about Graphics, C++, Optimization, Game Development, Programming Languages, and more. Personal blog of Philip Tretter writing under the alias of Artificial Mind. | |
| | | | |
disq.us
|
|
| | | In this text we'll have a look at a few examples that compare std::string_view against std::string. How much is std::string_view faster than standard std::string operations? Intro I was looking for some examples of string_view, and after a while, I got curious about the performance gain we might get. string_view is conceptually only a view of the string: usually implemented as[ptr, length]. | ||
