Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
errorstatistics.com | ||
| | | | |
alexanderetz.com
|
|
| | | | | [This post has been updated and turned into a paper to be published in AMPPS] Much of the discussion in psychology surrounding Bayesian inference focuses on priors. Should we embrace priors, or should we be skeptical? When are Bayesian methods sensitive to specification of the prior, and when do the data effectively overwhelm it? Should... | |
| | | | |
blog.apaonline.org
|
|
| | | | | "[C]onfusion about the foundations of the subject is responsible, in my opinion, for much of the misuse of the statistics that one meets in fields of application such as medicine, psychology, sociology, economics, and so forth." (George Barnard 1985, p. 2) "Relevant clarifications of the nature and roles of statistical evidence in scientific research may | |
| | | | |
summerseminarphilstat.com
|
|
| | | | | A key recognition among those who write on the statistical crisis in science is that the pressure to publish attention-getting articles can incentivize researchers to produce eye-catching but inadequately scrutinized claims. We may see much the same sensationalism in broadcasting metastatistical research, especially if it takes the form of scapegoating or banning statistical significance. A... | |
| | | | |
bbprompt.com
|
|
| | | 1 post published by Rachael Ritchey on August 27, 2021 | ||
