/explore
|
You are here 
|
reason.com | ||
| | | | |
theconversation.com
When Australia's government and opposition argue over how to get to net zero emissions, nuclear power is the flashpoint. The argument against nuclear is stronger, but not for the obvious reason. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.manhattancontrarian.com
At this site, when I have written about countries and states seeking to be among the leaders in eliminating fossil fuels from their electricity supply, I have generally focused on the larger jurisdictions, like Germany and the UK in Europe, and California and New York in the U.S. * But there is one much smaller country that puts all of those bigger ones to shame: Denmark. * With a population of only about 6 million, Denmark has pushed the "renewable" electricity generation thing well beyond what others have been able to accomplish. According to its official statistics, in 2024 Denmark got some 79.5% of its electricity from what it calls "low carbon" sources. The large majority of that came from wind and solar, with only a minimal contribution from nuclear. A... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
briangitt.com
Natural gas and nuclear power will be the big winners in the energy sector over the next 20 years. They have a competitive advantage over solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, coal, and oil. That advantage, combined with market factors, sets up rare investment opportunities to hold high-quality energy companies and buy natural gas and uranium futures. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
by Judith Curry Climate science is sometimes characterized by skeptics as pseudoscience. Here are the arguments for why climate science is not pseudoscience. From the Wikipedia: Pseudoscienceis a claim, belief, or practice which is presented asscientific, but does not ... Continue reading |
|
| | | |||
