/explore
|
You are here 
|
judithcurry.com | ||
| | | | |
www.climate-resistance.org
[AI summary] The discussion revolves around the concept of scientific consensus on climate change and the role of the Cook et al. paper in addressing perceived disagreements. Key points include: 1. **Consensus Clarification**: The Cook et al. paper aims to demonstrate strong agreement within the scientific community, countering claims of a lack of consensus. However, some argue that the paper oversimplifies the consensus by focusing on specific aspects (e.g., IPCC reports) and may not capture the full range of scientific opinions. 2. **Polarization and Misrepresentation**: The debate is seen as polarized, with scientists often viewed as part of a political stance rather than as neutral experts. This polarization is attributed to political influence on cli... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
critical-angle.net
In a recent article in Skeptical Inquirer, geologist and writer James Lawrence Powell, claims that there is a 99.99% scientific consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). You might think that after all of the harsh criticism that the 2013 Cook et al. paper(C13) has received from climate contrarians that we would be pleased to embrace... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
critical-angle.net
Thanks in good part to our critics, our paperQuantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literaturekeeps getting more attention. It almost seems that you can't open up a browser without seeing the "97%" meme somewhere. The extra interest prompted byRichard Tol's recent criticalarticlehas maintained the rate of downloads of the paper at... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
arctic-news.blogspot.com
Blog edited by Sam Carana, with news on climate change and warming in the Arctic due to snow and ice loss and methane releases from the seafloor. |
|
| | | |||
