|
You are here |
danischnider.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
dincosman.com
|
|
| | | | | The performance issue with an SQL query was resolved by using the /*+ PARALLEL(2) */ hint, reducing execution time from 180-200 seconds to milliseconds. The decision to perform a direct read from disk to memory instead of reading blocks from disk was made by the database engine and is controlled by the hidden "_serial_direct_read" parameter.... | |
| | | | |
tonyhasler.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | When a table is accessed by multiple members of a parallel query server set, the execution plan may show the use of block range granules (PX BLOCK ITERATOR) or partition granules (PX PARTITION [RANGE|LIST|HASH] ITERATOR or PX PARTITION [RANGE|LIST|HASH] ALL). The basic ideas surrounding these concepts are discussed in numerous blogs and books, including my... | |
| | | | |
rwijk.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | Here's a simple detail about bind peeking (during optimisation) that makes a big difference to "fetch first/next" queries. The optimizer knows about your bind types, and can peek at the bind values - but that doesn't mean it will do something sensible with them. Here's a little model to demonstrate the problem - starting with... | ||