Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
wattsupwiththat.com | ||
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The provided text is a discussion thread on climate change and the greenhouse effect, featuring various perspectives and arguments. The key points include debates over the role of CO2 in global warming, the mechanisms of the greenhouse effect, and the validity of climate models. Some contributors argue that CO2 does not significantly contribute to warming, while others support the mainstream scientific consensus. The discussion includes references to empirical data, such as temperature records from specific locations, and critiques of climate policy and scientific institutions. The tone varies between scientific analysis and skepticism, with some participants challenging the IPCC's conclusions and others defending the greenhouse effect as a fund... | |
| | | | |
www.populartechnology.net
|
|
| | | | | Carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant and the global warming debate has nothing to do with pollution. The average person has been misled... | |
| | | | |
wryheat.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | A monthly review of climate, energy, environmental, and political policy issues Articles compiled by Jonathan DuHamel (jedtaz@gmail.com) In this issue we examine several articles dealing with "net zero" - the elimination of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels. These articles show that "net zero" will have almost no effect on global temperature, but will... | |
| | | | |
tallbloke.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | A while ago I posted a tongue in cheek thread about the old Keihl and Trenberth Earth energy budget diagram and the new shiny all colour one NASA now has on their website. Here they are again for comparison: The major difference between these diagrams is the 'surface radiation' from the surface to the atmosphere... | ||
