|
You are here |
wattsupwiththat.com | ||
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | James Hansen's latest paper "Global warming in the pipeline" (Hansen et al. (2023)) has already been heavily criticized in a lengthy comment by Michael Mann, author of the original IPCC 'hockey stick'. However Mann does not deal with Hansen's surprisingly high (4.8°C) new estimate of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)[1]. This ECS estimate is 60% above... | |
| | | | |
breadonthewater.co.za
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article presents a skeptical analysis of the greenhouse effect and global warming claims, using Stefan-Boltzmann law calculations and lunar temperature comparisons to argue that human-induced CO2 contributes minimally to climate change, while noting that the reference category 'modelling' was not available in the provided list. | |
| | | | |
www.populartechnology.net
|
|
| | | | | Carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant and the global warming debate has nothing to do with pollution. The average person has been misled... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | by Judith Curry Climate science is sometimes characterized by skeptics as pseudoscience. Here are the arguments for why climate science is not pseudoscience. From the Wikipedia: Pseudoscienceis a claim, belief, or practice which is presented asscientific, but does not ... Continue reading | ||