|
You are here |
trueandreasonable.co | ||
| | | | |
bibleinterp.arizona.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This discussion centers around the debate between mythicist and historical interpretations of Jesus. Mythicists, such as Doherty and Carrier, argue that Jesus was a mythical figure, with the Gospels being symbolic or allegorical texts. They contend that the shift from Paul's view of Jesus as a celestial being to the historical Jesus in the Gospels required a sudden change in understanding, which they claim lacks historical evidence. Critics like Neil Godfrey and others argue that this transition is problematic for the myth theory and that the conventional view also faces challenges in explaining the development of the resurrection belief. The discussion touches on early Christian texts, the role of mythography, and the need for broader historica... | |
| | | | |
richardcarrier.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | I've sent a formal progress report to all donors explaining what I've gotten done, what's delayed me, and what I still have to do to complet... | |
| | | | |
stephenlaw.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | (Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE... | |
| | | | |
armariummagnus.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | Hollywood Hokum - Again It looks like some pseudo historical myths about the history of science are about to get a new shot in the arm, t... | ||