/explore
|
You are here 
|
trueandreasonable.co | ||
| | | | |
bibleinterp.arizona.edu
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] This discussion centers around the debate between mythicist and historical interpretations of Jesus. Mythicists, such as Doherty and Carrier, argue that Jesus was a mythical figure, with the Gospels being symbolic or allegorical texts. They contend that the shift from Paul's view of Jesus as a celestial being to the historical Jesus in the Gospels required a sudden change in understanding, which they claim lacks historical evidence. Critics like Neil Godfrey and others argue that this transition is problematic for the myth theory and that the conventional view also faces challenges in explaining the development of the resurrection belief. The discussion touches on early Christian texts, the role of mythography, and the need for broader historica... | |
| | | | |
richardcarrier.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | I've sent a formal progress report to all donors explaining what I've gotten done, what's delayed me, and what I still have to do to complet... | |
| | | | |
stephenlaw.blogspot.com
|
|
| | | | | (Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE... | |
| | | | |
historyforatheists.com
|
|
| | | When I began "History for Atheists" in October 2015 it was largely as an opportunity to put down some summaries of why certain persistent New Atheist pseudo historical myths are wrong, curate the positions of expert historians and other scholars on relevant issues and direct readers to reliable information on history. This was at least, in part, because I found myself writing refutations to the same nonsense claims over and over again and was starting to find the repetition pretty... Read More Read More | ||
