Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
www.climateconversation.org.nz | ||
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | | | Guest post by Bob Tisdale This is a deviation from my typical presentation of a subdivided dataset. Usually, I divide the dataset in a way that is intended to illustrate how and why natural variables can explain the warming over the term of that data. In this post, I've broken it into subsections that allow... | |
| | | | |
scienceofdoom.com
|
|
| | | | | The debate about climate change is a very polarized one. Understanding the points of view of people who disagree with you is essential to making progress. Even more importantly, you should understand the arguments that summarize the best of the opposite point of view. Much that is written in the general media is the "polarized... | |
| | | | |
judithcurry.com
|
|
| | | | | by Judith Curry On the politics of climate expertise thread, we discussed Kevin Trenberth's statement: Given that global warming is "unequivocal", to quote the 2007 IPCC report, the null hypothesis should now be reversed, thereby placing the burden of proof ... Continue reading ? | |
| | | | |
wattsupwiththat.com
|
|
| | | Current climate models parameterise clouds and atmospheric water is treated as a "Greenhouse Gas" when it exists in the atmosphere as gas, liquid and solid. The solid phase is a key factor in the formation of reflective clouds. These phases are all responsive to surface temperature at the base of the atmospheric column and surface... | ||
