Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
divisbyzero.com | ||
| | | | |
mappingignorance.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The discussion revolves around the productivity of Word and LaTeX for document creation, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Word is praised for its ease of use, collaboration features, and handling of long texts, while LaTeX excels in mathematical typesetting, automation of references, and producing high-quality documents. The debate includes user experiences, with some advocating for Word's versatility and others favoring LaTeX for complex academic work. The conclusion suggests that the choice depends on the task's complexity and collaboration needs. | |
| | | | |
castingoutnines.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Over the weekend a minor smack-talk session opened up on Twitter between Maria Andersen and about half a dozen other math people about MathType versus $latex \LaTeX$. Maria is on record as being pro-MathType and yesterday she claimed that $latex \LaTeX$ is "not intuitive to learn". I warned her that a pro-$latex \LaTeX$ blog post... | |
| | | | |
www.schuetzler.net
|
|
| | | | | A recently published article in PLoS ONE, entitled "An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used in Academic Research and Development" (link here) lit the world on fire. Okay, not really. In fact, most people, including researchers and even LaTeX enthusiasts have probably not read it. And that's fine. | |
| | | | |
www.hrsfans.org
|
|
| | | |||
