Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
users.cms.caltech.edu | ||
| | | | |
quantumfrontiers.com
|
|
| | | | | Summer is a great time for academics. Imagine: three full months off! Hit the beach. Tune that golf pitch. Hike the sierras. Go on a cruise. Watch soccer with the brazilenos (there's been better years for that one). Catch the sunset by the Sydney opera house. Take a nap. Think that's outrageous? We have it... | |
| | | | |
mycqstate.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | In a previous post I reported on the beautiful recent result by Natarajan and Wright showing the astounding power of multi-prover interactive proofs with quantum provers sharing entanglement: in letters, $latex {\text{NEEXP} \subseteq \text{MIP}^\star}&fg=000000$. In this post I want to report on follow-up work with Ji, Natarajan, Wright, and Yuen, that we just posted to... | |
| | | | |
simons.berkeley.edu
|
|
| | | | | This workshop will focus on quantum interactive proofs and entangled quantum games. It will include recent advances in our understanding of the complexity class QMIP of multiple entangled provers, as well as QPIP, quantum polynomial time bounded provers. The workshop will also address quantum PCP from an interactive proof perspective. Enquiries may be sent to the organizers workshop_qhc1 [at] lists.simons.berkeley.edu (at this address.) | |
| | | | |
dominiczypen.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | Motivation. We show that the space $latex (\aleph_1, \aleph_1\cup\{\aleph_1\})$ satisfies the selection principle $latex {\Omega \choose T}$, but not $latex {\Omega \choose \Gamma}$. This gives a negative answer to the question "$latex {\Omega \choose T} = {\Omega \choose \Gamma}?$" in the general setting. Below is a self-contained treatment of the matter.Let $latex (X,\tau)$ be a... | ||
