/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.dorfonlaw.org | ||
| | | | |
www.scotusblog.com
The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a ruling by a federal district court holding that a congressional district on the South Carolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander - that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race. In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the justices cle |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
verdict.justia.com
UC Davis Law professor Vikram David Amar comments on the Wisconsin Supreme Courts recent decision invalidating the states legislative district lines based on its finding that they were unconstitutional due to non-contiguous territories, a decision criticized by conservatives as partisan. Professor Amar points out that this ruling, focused only on state legislative districts, does not directly implicate the Independent State Legislature theory discussed in the U.S. Supreme Courts Moore v. Harper case, as ... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
amylhowe.com
The Supreme Court on Thursday threw out a ruling by a federal district court holding that a congressional district on the South Carolina coast was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander - that is, it sorted voters based primarily on their race. In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the justices cleared the way for the state... Read More |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.pbs.org
The committee is taking a close examination of Trump's actions on Jan. 6. The focus of this hearing is on the three-plus hours during the insurrection at the Capitol when Trump failed to act to stop the attack. |
|
| | | |||
