Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
researchpracticesandtools.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
gowers.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | There is widespread (even if not universal) agreement that something is deeply wrong with the current system of academic publishing. The basic point, which has been made innumerable times by innumerable people, is that the really hard parts -- the writing of papers, and the peer review and selection of the ones to publish --... | |
| | | | |
www.populartechnology.net
|
|
| | | | | A frequent source of contention in the global warming debate is the existence of peer-reviewed papers supporting skeptic arguments. Thes... | |
| | | | |
dailynous.com
|
|
| | | | | Two philosophers have recently floated proposals for fixing the referee crisis in philosophy. What crisis? Well here's one statement of it. In the culmination of a four-part series on the problem at his blog---the last part is here, and includes links to the previous ones---Daniel Rubio (Toronto Metropolitan) focuses on what he identifies as "the | |
| | | | |
journals.plos.org
|
|
| | | |||
