Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
researchpracticesandtools.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
blog.scienceopen.com
|
|
| | | | | It's not too hard to see that the practices of and attitudes towards 'open science' are evolving amidst an ongoing examination about what the modern scholarly system should look like. While we might be more familiar with the ongoing debate about how to best implement open access to research articles and to the data behind [...] | |
| | | | |
gowers.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | There is widespread (even if not universal) agreement that something is deeply wrong with the current system of academic publishing. The basic point, which has been made innumerable times by innumerable people, is that the really hard parts -- the writing of papers, and the peer review and selection of the ones to publish --... | |
| | | | |
drugmonkey.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Commenter mikka wants to know why: I don't get this "professional editors are not scientists" trope. All the professional editors I know were bench scientists at the start of their career. They read, write, look at and interpret data, talk to bench scientists and keep abreast of their fields. In a nutshell, they do what... | |
| | | | |
www.muskegonpundit.com
|
|
| | | [AI summary] The author critiques an Earth.com article for incorrectly claiming that climate change threatens life, arguing instead that data shows biomass is increasing due to warming and CO2 levels. | ||
