Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
researchpracticesandtools.blogspot.com | ||
| | | | |
www.populartechnology.net
|
|
| | | | | A frequent source of contention in the global warming debate is the existence of peer-reviewed papers supporting skeptic arguments. Thes... | |
| | | | |
drugmonkey.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | Commenter mikka wants to know why: I don't get this "professional editors are not scientists" trope. All the professional editors I know were bench scientists at the start of their career. They read, write, look at and interpret data, talk to bench scientists and keep abreast of their fields. In a nutshell, they do what... | |
| | | | |
dailynous.com
|
|
| | | | | Two philosophers have recently floated proposals for fixing the referee crisis in philosophy. What crisis? Well here's one statement of it. In the culmination of a four-part series on the problem at his blog---the last part is here, and includes links to the previous ones---Daniel Rubio (Toronto Metropolitan) focuses on what he identifies as "the | |
| | | | |
www.scienceeurope.org
|
|
| | | In the last few years, science communication has established itself as a separate discipline with specific expertise. Science communication is the practice of informing, raising awareness of science-related topics, and also getting involved with audiences that include, at least in part, people from outside the science community. Science Europe views science communication as an essential element in strengthening the role and contribution of science in tackling societal challenges and is committed to work ... | ||
