Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
blog.vito.nyc | ||
| | | | |
lisp-journey.gitlab.io
|
|
| | | | | In 2018, I wrote a blog post and the Cookbook page on how to build Common Lisp binaries, and how to parse command-line arguments with the unix-opts library.But since then, new libraries were created an they are pretty good! They are simpler to use, and have much more features. I had a good experience with Clingon: its usage is clear, its documentation is very good, it is very flexible (it has hooks and generic functions waiting to have an :around method) and @dnaeon is not at his first great CL project. | |
| | | | |
berthub.eu
|
|
| | | | | In previous articles, I've waxed rhapsodic about how great C++ is. I also noted there however that every language, C++ included, has its dark sides. Some languages have an unavoidable pervasive dark side, like being slow or hard to multithread, for C++ that dark side is mostly its complexity. In this post I want to zoom in on a specific 'gotcha' that recently took me several hours to resolve. I wrote this piece so anyone running into the same issue might find out about it if they search the web. | |
| | | | |
gcher.com
|
|
| | | | | Recently I got interested in the new Apple language Swift, that will probably replace objective-c as the language of choice for native iOS and OSX applications. There are many things I like in Swift, and also other things I don't like. But one thing that I really enjoy is the support for lambdas, specially compared to the way it works in C++. Why do I think the lambdas in swift are better? | |
| | | | |
eyakubovich.github.io
|
|
| | | The Google Style Guide (GSG) for C++ has become popular outside of just Google. But I don't like it at all. There... I said it. Now I want to take this opportunity to explain why I feel so strongly about it. GSG "style" The general observation is that the style... | ||
