/explore
|
You are here |
blog.swgillespie.me | ||
| | | | |
andreabergia.com
This post is part of the Languages Opinion series. Languages opinion - part one - JVM Languages opinion - part two - Rust ?thispost Languages opinion - part three - Javascript and Typescript Welcome back to my mini-series about programming languages. In this post, we will talk about one of the most interesting programming languages that I have seen in a long while: Rust. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
ruudvanasseldonk.com
I am adding a type system to RCL, my configuration language. In part 1, I explain what I want from the type system. |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
chadaustin.me
This may be the only time I weigh in on the static vs. dynamic typing discussion. Each side has its extreme proponents, and people differ in their ability and desire to work in systems with implicit invariants. Many years ago, back when Java and C++ were the Mainstream Languages and Python was the shiny new up-and-comer, I read Bruce Eckel's arguments in support of dynamically typed languages, and some of the nonobvious (at the time) ways you can get more done at higher quality in a more flexible languag... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
zackoverflow.dev
The answer is "very often" |
|
| | | |||