|
You are here |
joecarlsmith.com | ||
| | | | |
handsandcities.com
|
|
| | | | | Final essay in a four-part series, explaining why I think that one prominent approach to anthropic reasoning (the "Self-Indication Assumption" or "SIA") is better than another (the "Self-Sampling Assumption" or "SSA"). This part discusses some prominent objections to SIA. | |
| | | | |
unstableontology.com
|
|
| | | | | (or: "Please Do Anthropics with Actual Math") The anthropic shadow argument states something like: Anthropic principle! If the LHC had worked, it would have produced a black hole or strangelet or vacuum failure, and we wouldn't be here! or: You can't use "we survived the cold war without nuclear war" as evidence of anything. Because... | |
| | | | |
reducing-suffering.org
|
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
qri.org
|
|
| | | [AI summary] An in-depth exploration of Steven Lehar's theories on visual reification, flame fronts, and shock scaffolds, proposing that the brain acts as a field-based computer solving the inverse optics problem through nonlinear wave phenomena. | ||