Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
joecarlsmith.com | ||
| | | | |
philpapers.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The provided text is a collection of various academic and philosophical works, including journal articles, essays, and book preprints, covering topics such as cosmology, the philosophy of science, the anthropic principle, and the fine-tuning argument. It includes discussions on the structure of the universe, the nature of time, and the role of consciousness in science. There are also mentions of specific authors and their contributions to these fields, as well as some critiques of Bayesian reasoning and anthropic arguments. The text also contains some personal reflections and opinions on current scientific and philosophical debates. | |
| | | | |
www.greaterwrong.com
|
|
| | | | | A Critique of Functional Decision Theory There's a long-running issue where many in the rationality community take functional decision theory (and its variants) very seriously, but the academic decision theory community does not. But there's been little public discussion of FDT from academic decision theorists (one exception is here); this note attempts to partly address this gap. So that there's a clear object of discussion, I'm going to focus on Yudkowsky and Soares' 'Functional Decision Theory' (which I'll refer to as Y&S), though I also read a revised version of Soares and Levinstein's Cheating Death in Damascus. | |
| | | | |
scottaaronson.blog
|
|
| | | | | I've been increasingly tempted to make this blog into a forum solely for responding to the posts at Overcoming Bias. (Possible new name: "Wallowing in Bias.") Two days ago, Robin Hanson pointed to a fascinating paper by Bousso, Harnik, Kribs, and Perez, on predicting the cosmological constant from an "entropic" version of the anthropic principle.... | |
| | | | |
www.lesswrong.com
|
|
| | | Followup to: Anthropic Reasoning in UDT by Wei Dai ... | ||
