Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
theindependentresearchers.wordpress.com | ||
| | | | |
anticovid20192020.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | 3 ????????? 2021 ~ Independent Researchers ???? ???????? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ????????????? ??????? ??? ????? ????????????? ???????????? ??????? ?? ??? ????????? ??? SARS-CoV-2 ??? ??? ?????????? ??? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????? ???. ?? ??? ?????????? ????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ?? ??????????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ???????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? - ??????? ???... | |
| | | | |
lemire.me
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article discusses the limitations of peer review in science, using historical and contemporary examples to argue that it is not the gold standard. It highlights cases where peer review may suppress innovative or controversial ideas, such to the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. The piece critiques the suppression of dissenting views and the role of funding and institutional pressures in shaping scientific discourse. It concludes that science should be open and progressive, with peer review being a tool rather than a gatekeeping mechanism. | |
| | | | |
changingtimes.media
|
|
| | | | | This article has been updated. Latest update 29/3/2021 Audio digest (before updates): French translation (before updates) @ France Soir. Researchers say there's evidence within the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests the virus is a product of genetic manipulation. Exiled Chinese scientist Li-Meng Yan says SARS-CoV-2 is an "unrestricted bioweapon" and there's been "large-scale, organised scientific... | |
| | | | |
ifttt.itbehere.com
|
|
| | | |||
