/explore
|
You are here 
|
www.hillelwayne.com | ||
| | | | |
ruudvanasseldonk.com
|
|
| | | | | I am adding a type system to RCL, my configuration language. In part 4, we look at how the typechecker is implemented in Rust, and at how it is able to generate good error messages. | |
| | | | |
degoes.net
|
|
| | | | | Functional programming has a bit of jargon, but that doesn't have to stop you from understanding core concepts | |
| | | | |
jrsinclair.com
|
|
| | | | | If you start learning about functional programming, it won't be long before you come across the idea of pure functions. And as you go on, you will discover functional programmers appear to be obsessed with them. "Pure functions let you reason about your code," they say. "Pure functions are less likely to start a thermonuclear war." "Pure functions giveyou referential transparency". On and on it goes. And they have a point. Pure functions are a good thing. But what do you do with the impure bits of your c... | |
| | | | |
michaelscodingspot.com
|
|
| | | Michael Shpilt's Blog on .NET software development, C#, performance, debugging, and programming productivity | ||
