Explore >> Select a destination


You are here

elifesciences.org
| | nca2023.globalchange.gov
6.8 parsecs away

Travel
| | Appendix 4 of the Fifth National Climate Assessment
| | iamirmasoud.com
5.5 parsecs away

Travel
| | Amir Masoud Sefidian
| | www.nature.com
5.3 parsecs away

Travel
| | Timely evaluation of the protective effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern is urgently needed to inform pandemic control planning. Based on 78 vaccine efficacy or effectiveness (VE) data from 49 studies and 1,984,241 SARS-CoV-2 sequences collected from 31 regions, we analyzed the relationship between genetic distance (GD) of circulating viruses against the vaccine strain and VE against symptomatic in...
| | lemire.me
28.3 parsecs away

Travel
| [AI summary] The article discusses the limitations of peer review in science, using historical and contemporary examples to argue that it is not the gold standard. It highlights cases where peer review may suppress innovative or controversial ideas, such to the lab origin of SARS-CoV-2. The piece critiques the suppression of dissenting views and the role of funding and institutional pressures in shaping scientific discourse. It concludes that science should be open and progressive, with peer review being a tool rather than a gatekeeping mechanism.