|
You are here |
kgoldfeld.github.io | ||
| | | | |
www.huber.embl.de
|
|
| | | | | If you are a biologist and want to get the best out of the powerful methods of modern computational statistics, this is your book. | |
| | | | |
www.rdatagen.net
|
|
| | | | | Simulation can be super helpful for estimating power or sample size requirements when the study design is complex. This approach has some advantages over an analytic one (i.e.one based on a formula), particularly the flexibility it affords in setting up the specific assumptions in the planned study, such as time trends, patterns of missingness, or effects of different levels of clustering. A downside is certainly the complexity of writing the code as well as the computation time, which can be a bit painful. My goal here is to show that at least writing the code need not be overwhelming. | |
| | | | |
aosmith.rbind.io
|
|
| | | | | I walk through an example of simulating data from a binomial generalized linear mixed model with a logit link and then exploring estimates of over/underdispersion. | |
| | | | |
vxlabs.com
|
|
| | | I have recently become fascinated with (Variational) Autoencoders and with PyTorch. Kevin Frans has a beautiful blog post online explaining variational autoencoders, with examples in TensorFlow and, importantly, with cat pictures. Jaan Altosaar's blog post takes an even deeper look at VAEs from both the deep learning perspective and the perspective of graphical models. Both of these posts, as well as Diederik Kingma's original 2014 paper Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes, are more than worth your time. | ||