/explore
|
You are here 
|
wattsupwiththat.com | ||
| | | | |
www.populartechnology.net
After showing how 97 articles thoroughly refuted the most prominent "consensus" study, Cook et al. (2013) , consensus proponents inevitabl... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
www.climate-resistance.org
[AI summary] The discussion revolves around the concept of scientific consensus on climate change and the role of the Cook et al. paper in addressing perceived disagreements. Key points include: 1. **Consensus Clarification**: The Cook et al. paper aims to demonstrate strong agreement within the scientific community, countering claims of a lack of consensus. However, some argue that the paper oversimplifies the consensus by focusing on specific aspects (e.g., IPCC reports) and may not capture the full range of scientific opinions. 2. **Polarization and Misrepresentation**: The debate is seen as polarized, with scientists often viewed as part of a political stance rather than as neutral experts. This polarization is attributed to political influence on cli... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
andymaypetrophysicist.com
By Andy May The featured image for this post is from Angela Wheeler at the CO2 Coalition, used with permission. This post is a comment on Cobb, 2024, the paper is entitled "The politics of climate denialism and the secondary denialism of economics." The paper defines climate denialism, discusses the reasons it exists, and the... |
|
| | | | | ||
| | | | |
science2017.globalchange.gov
This report is an authoritative assessment of the science of climate change, with a focus on the United States. It represents the first of two volumes of the Fourth National Climate Assessment, mandated by the Global Change Research Act of 1990. |
|
| | | |||
