Explore >> Select a destination
|
You are here 
|
wingolog.org | ||
| | | | |
pmig96.wordpress.com
|
|
| | | | | When I heard of WebAssembly (WASM for short) a few years ago, I thought: take your C program, compile it to WASM and the browser will simply run it, right? Well, WASM is not (yet) a first-class citizen in the browser world. It does not have access to all APIs and resources that JavaScript has.... | |
| | | | |
paulbutler.org
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The post discusses the current state and challenges of embedding WebAssembly outside of browsers, focusing on runtime choices, memory management, and interface design for applications like real-time multiplayer games. | |
| | | | |
thecodebarbarian.com
|
|
| | | | | [AI summary] The article explains how to use WebAssembly in Node.js for optimizing arithmetic operations and benchmarks its performance against JavaScript. | |
| | | | |
dusty.phillips.codes
|
|
| | | In earlier articles, we have implemented a tokenizer, parser, and transformer to convert the Web Assembly Text Format to an Abstract Syntax Tree that can hopefully easily compile to Wasm. Truthfully, the next step should be validation. Validation is the process of statically analyzing the syntax tree to catch as many errors as possible. This is where things like type checking and borrow checking happen, for example. The wasm spec has an in-depth description of what validation should look like for a conforming compiler. | ||
